Some Lessons from Transaction - Cost Politics for Less - Developed Countries ∗ by Avinash Dixit Princeton University
نویسنده
چکیده
Transaction-cost politics views economic policymaking as a political process constrained by asymmetric information and limited commitment possibilities. This paper examines some implications of this perspective for less-developed countries considering policy reform. It emphasizes that success requires reform of the rules and institutions which govern the strategic interaction of the participants in the political game, and that reforms must cope with the special interests and asymmetric information which already exist. In this light, it examines some broad issues of the design of constitutions and institutions (definition and enforcement of property rights, control of inflation and of government expenditures, federalism, and redistribution), as well as some specific issue of the design of organizations and incentives (problems posed by the interaction of multiple tasks and multiple interests, and their interaction with the limitations on auditing and administration that exists in many LDCs).
منابع مشابه
Some Lessons from Transaction - Cost Politics for Less - Developed Countries ∗ by Avinash Dixit
Transaction-cost politics views economic policymaking as a political process constrained by asymmetric information and limited commitment possibilities. This paper examines some implications of this perspective for less-developed countries considering policy reform. It emphasizes that success requires reform of the rules and institutions which govern the strategic interaction of the participant...
متن کاملEquilibrium Contracts for the Central Bank of a
We consider a politicized monetary union where member governments influence the policy of the common central bank using incentive contracts. We find that if the bank cares only about these incentives, the equilibrium implements a weighted average of the countries’ most preferred policies. Making the bank inflation averse and/or directly concerned with the countries’ economies is undesirable in ...
متن کاملDemocracy, Autocracy, and Bureaucracy * European Summer School for the New Institutional Economics for Com- Ments on Earlier Versions Presented under Different Titles. I Also Thank the National Science Foundation for Financial Support
Democratic and autocratic rulers alike must use a bureaucracy to implement policy. In each case the optimal policy is a second-best solution to this agency problem, giving the bureaucrat some economic rent for information revelation and effort incentive. This paper argues that autocrats are less willing to sacrifice rents, and therefore accept a worse second-best (here less of a public good) th...
متن کاملPredatory States and Failing States: An Agency Perspective
In any non-trivial state, policies decided at the top levels of government are administered by middle-level bureaucrats. I examine whether this agency problem can contribute to explaining state failure in matters of provision of public goods. I find some theoretical arguments to support the view that failure is more likely in states whose top rulers have predatory motives. When the bureaucrats’...
متن کاملLong-term Care Financing: Inserting Politics and Resource Allocation in the Debate; Comment on “Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan”
The ageing of the countries’ populations, and in particular the growing number of the very old, is increasing the need for long-term care (LTC). Not surprisingly, therefore, the financing of LTC systems has become a crucial topic across the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In the last three decades, various financing policies have been carr...
متن کامل